by Anonymous
People like to call hedonism terrible, and people dispel it as an insult. You can use this hedonism when someone’s behaviour or opinion seems too libertine or lacks dignity.
Hedonism, like pessimism, has been destroyed and used in the meaning of others, so that it has been truly turned into an insult, purely the depravity and filth of scum and addicts.
Yet no one challenges hedonism seriously, it is always observed from a biased wrongfully highly empirically based viewpoint or traditionally based viewpoint, rather than a more analytical and existential observation.
To look at evil as certain truth here is worthless, it is not wise to classify that which requires one to make an individual judgment and to distinguish between the topics of the difference between the brain and the mind (including knowledge), this a job fit for extremely advanced technology.
The analysis of something is of evil is done on a subject level, by understanding all relevant knowledge through bias within the subject, this can take a while and it is generally agreed upon that it is a continual process.
It is easier for someone to bring a topic into his/her control by staying with it and reinforcing it, and harder by seeing it as a subjective component of the environment (who is influencing what), this takes consistency and attention, not everyone can do it.
Now to say that suffering is “bad” naturally comes close to a less faulty reasoning, as it is difficult to create any negative perception or general perception of “bad” without suffering.
To view “good” as a fact here is likewise, pointless, good to be divided into categories that require a person to make that judgment and to distinguish between topics is the difference between the brain and the mind (including knowledge).
There is no such thing as ‘good’, everything is subject to having a form of ‘good’, whether good or evil, so that we may distinguish between the two.
Now to say pleasure is the source of good is closer to a less logically faulty argument, as it is hard to create any conception of good without pleasures’ existence.
If we have to find some useful moral questions, I find that this begs the question and answers of Hedonism.
First of all, as a central question, what is the use of only involving you, behaviour, life and existence? Why are you still alive? What makes life worth experiencing?
Take your time and find out,
Now I will pick and study this and see if you might at least be different.
If we remove happiness ( a form of pleasure), if your answer was not removed, does your answer still suffice?
If we remove fulfilment and the feeling of overcoming hardship (both are forms of pleasure), if your answer was not removed, does your answer still suffice?
If we remove ( a form of pleasure), if your answer was not removed, does your answer still suffice?
If we remove amusement and/or laughter ( a form of pleasure), if your answer was not removed, does your answer still suffice?
If we remove delight ( a form of pleasure), if your answer was not removed, does your answer still suffice?
If we remove gratefulness, thankfulness and being glad(forms of pleasure attainment and pleasures) , if your answer was not removed, does your answer still suffice?
If we remove satisfaction ( a form of pleasure), if your answer was not removed, does your answer still suffice?
If we eliminate happiness (a pleasure), but if your answer is not deleted, is your answer still enough?
If we eliminate the feeling of satisfaction and overcoming difficulties (which are all forms of pleasure), if your answer is not eliminated, is your answer enough?
If we eliminate entertainment and/or laughter (a pleasure), but if your answer is not deleted, is your answer still enough?
If we eliminate joy (a pleasure), if your answer is not eliminated, is your answer still enough?
If we eliminate gratitude, gratitude and happiness (both in the form of obtaining pleasure and pleasure), if your answer is not deleted, is your answer still enough?
If we cancel satisfaction (a pleasure), if your answer is not deleted, is your answer still enough?
Finally, now, if we eliminate pleasure, all of its pleasures, everything that brings you a good feeling, and only if your answer is not eliminated, the only thing that allows you to establish kindness and all kinds of good ideas, Is your answer still enough?
What is the use of life, if it was without its only benefit. If it is not for pleasure and all forms of pleasure, we couldn’t even imagine goodness.
Meditation and philosophies cantered on it, Nirvana, and hedonism are positions that take part in the full recognition and affirmation of life, everything else just denies death, distracting from the facts of what our existence provides and how to use our life time. Just as a final note, I do not believe that drug addicts and sex addicts are the perfect hedonists people claim to be, they are usually very unhappy, unstable, harming themselves, and only “enjoy” brief moments constantly, rather than taking part in long term stable enjoyment of life.